<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://linux-vserver.at/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://linux-vserver.at/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JustinWick</id>
		<title>Linux-VServer - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://linux-vserver.at/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JustinWick"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://linux-vserver.at/Special:Contributions/JustinWick"/>
		<updated>2026-04-09T23:43:03Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.20.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://linux-vserver.at/Talk:Usage_Scenarios</id>
		<title>Talk:Usage Scenarios</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://linux-vserver.at/Talk:Usage_Scenarios"/>
				<updated>2007-01-03T22:14:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JustinWick: When to use, when not to use?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== When not to use VServer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMHO, it'd be great if this page linked to a page containing situations where VServer is *not* appropriate, so that it isn't misused (especially in a security context).  It should be made clear that VServer's incredible efficiency comes at a price and it would be great to help people determine what side of that trade off their situation falls in.  - [[User:JustinWick|JustinWick]] 23:14, 3 January 2007 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JustinWick</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://linux-vserver.at/Talk:Overview</id>
		<title>Talk:Overview</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://linux-vserver.at/Talk:Overview"/>
				<updated>2007-01-03T21:39:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JustinWick: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Emulation = Dynamic Recompilation??? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm no expert on this, but why in the world would this article claim that &amp;quot;dynamic compilation&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;emulation&amp;quot;?  I understand that dynamic compilation is sometimes used in an emulator, as opposed to a run-time interpreter, or a setup that pre-translates the text/data segments of a program before it's run, but the statement &amp;quot;The virtual machine simulates the complete hardware, allowing an unmodified OS for a completely different CPU to be run. This is also known as Dynamic Recompilation&amp;quot; is very misleading, especially for those new to virtualization.  I'd suggest the second sentence be changed to &amp;quot;Emulators often use Dynamic Recompilation for efficiency purposes.&amp;quot; - [[User:JustinWick|JustinWick]] 22:39, 3 January 2007 (CET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JustinWick</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>